-----Original Message----- From: Patrick [mailto:[email address]] Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 9:17 AM To: Jack Layne; Dr. Clayborne Carson; Daniel Nester; Ed Colimore; Steve C Patterson; Jenn Lucas; Bill Kelly; Kevin Shelly; Aaron Moselle Subject: That fateful night, the truth comes out!
I have uncovered the true story of what happened in Mary's Cafe that night. King and his friends never ordered any alcohol, they actually never had the chance to order anything. I have found the first biography of King written just 2 months after he was assassinated. In it, it gives quotes as to what happened that evening. They never tried to order alcohol, they were there for food.
The statement of the restaurant owner, which for some odd reason, has been taken as gospel and regurgitated by many authors and historians, was merely an attempt to "drop a taser" next to the victims of the event. The restaurant owner was creating leverage in order to create a justification for not serving the young black people and pulling out a gun on them.
The grand jury was considering charges against King and McCall for attempting to buy alcohol on a Sunday, as they were considering charges against Ernest Nichols, the gun wielding owner is Mary's Cafe. The statement of Ernie Nichols was written and given to prosecutors 8 days after the incident occurred.
In the 1968 biography, His life, martyrdom and the meaning of the world, it's clear they went to the restaurant seeking food and never got to order anything. When they realized they were the only blacks in the restaurant, and also realized they were the only ones not receiving service, they sat in protest, hence being the first official sit in the civil rights movement.
Which infuriated the owner of the restaurant who then threatened the young group with a 45 caliber pistol and stuck it into McCalls face. When they still refused to leave the bartender fired off some shots into the air and exclaimed "I'll kill for less".
This caused them to exit and go to the police who later arrested the restaurant owner. The complaint against Nichols was singed and dated June 12th 1950 at 12:45 am. If in fact the story of the restaurant owner was true, he could have easily waged a complaint against the four young black people who he claimed were very insistent on buying alcohol on a Sunday. There were several other witnesses in the bar, some of which refused to help King and his friends. If these same witnesses had seen the 4 young black people insisting the restaurant owner sell them alcohol on that night, it is correct to assume they would have bore witness to such and a complaint would have been filed and King and his friends would have also been arrested.
The history books and news stories need to be redacted of the claim of the restaurant owner made against King and friends; that they were trying to buy alcohol. It's historically inaccurate and attempts to justify the restaurant owners use of a weapon and refusal of service to the young black people, who were actually the victims. The video of the situation is not available, as it is in the Walter Scott assassination, but the facts are now available and the story must be rewritten to reflect the truth. They were hungry and the restaurant owner was a racist, who's lawyer helped concoct a story that justified the bigots decision to not serve black people and threaten them with a gun.
Bibliography 1970 interview with Walter McCall 1968 book -His life, martyrdom and the meaning of the world 1950 complaint of June 12th 1950 1950 June 20th statement of Ernest Nichols Sent from my iPhone=