This is my second request.
Dear Nutley Township,
Please accept this electronic request for public records made under OPRA and the common law right of access. I am not required to fill out an official form or use a particular software platform to submit my request per NJSA 47:1A-6(f), which states that an email from a requester including all of the information required on the adopted form shall suffice in place of a completed form as a valid government record request.
I HAVE NOT been convicted of any indictable offense under the laws of New Jersey, any other state, or the United States.
I WILL NOT use the requested government records for a commercial purpose.
I AM NOT seeking records in connection with a legal proceeding.
Records requested:
This is my second request. The first request timed out due to my neglect.
This is the same request.
I request a copy of the police body cam on or about Veterans Day 2025 involving Carmine Alessio at the Nutley police station.
I will simplify my request.
RE: UNLAWFUL DENIAL/DELAY OF OPRA REQUEST #[Insert Number] – BWC FOOTAGE
To the Records Custodian:
This letter serves as a formal notice that your continued [denial/delay] regarding the production of Body Worn Camera (BWC) footage constitutes an unlawful denial of access under the Open Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq., and a violation of the NJ Supreme Court’s holdings in North Jersey Media Group v. Township of Lyndhurst.
1. BWC Footage is a "Required Record" by Law. You are hereby notified that under N.J.S.A. 40A:14-118.5(k), BWC recordings are expressly subject to OPRA. Unlike dashboard cameras (MVRs), BWCs are mandated by statute and Attorney General Directive. Therefore, they fail the "criminal investigatory record" exemption test because they are required by law to be made and maintained. Any attempt to classify this footage as an exempt "investigatory record" is a misapplication of the law.
2. Failure to Meet the "Inimical to Public Interest" Standard Under N.J.S.A. 47:1A-3(a), you cannot withhold records based on an "ongoing investigation" unless you can prove that disclosure would be "inimical to the public interest." Generally, boilerplate claims of "investigative integrity" do not meet the legal threshold established in Lyndhurst. You must provide a specific, fact-based explanation as to how the release of this specific video would jeopardize a specific investigation.
3. Notice of Potential Personal Liability Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-11, any public official or custodian who is found to have "knowingly and willfully" violated OPRA and unreasonably denied access under the totality of the circumstances shall be subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 for an initial violation. Your continued refusal to follow clearly established Supreme Court precedent and Attorney General Directives provides evidence of a willful violation.
4. Mandatory Fee Shifting Be advised that OPRA is a fee-shifting statute. If I am forced to file a Summary Action in Superior Court (an "Order to Show Cause") and I prevail, the Township is statutorily required to pay all of my legal fees and court costs (N.J.S.A. 47:1A-6). These fees often reach tens of thousands of dollars, for which the taxpayers of Nutley will be responsible due to your office's non-compliance.
FINAL DEMAND: I demand that the requested records be produced within three (3) business days. If the records are not produced, I will proceed with a formal complaint via the Government Records Council (GRC) or the Superior Court of New Jersey, seeking both the records and the imposition of personal fines against the custodian.
Governing law requires you to redact, not withhold. If there are privacy concerns, blur the faces, but release the record.
I await your immediate compliance.
Rory Moore
My preferred delivery method for response(s) to this request is by email as attachments. Please confirm you have received this request. If you are not the custodian of records, please forward my request to that person and provide their email address to me for future reference.
Yours faithfully,
Rory Moore
Mr. Moore,
This correspondence shall serve as Nutley Township (the “Township”)’s
response to your request for access to government records pursuant to the
Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1, et seq. (“OPRA”), which was
received by the Township on January 20, 2026 during regular office hours.
Attached is a copy of your request for records, and below is the
Township’s response to the same:
Please see below a link to the requested footage. Personal identifying
information has been redacted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1. PLEASE NOTE
THAT THE LINK TO THE FILE(S) WILL EXPIRE IN 30 DAYS, so be sure to move
the data to a permanent location.
[1]Folder icon [2]OPRA 33-26
As this is the second time you have requested and received the same exact
record, please be advised that any further requests from you for the same
video will be denied as previously fulfilled.
To the extent that you have also requested access to the above government
records under the common law, your stated interest in obtaining the
records must be balanced against the Township of Nutley’s interest in
nondisclosure. See Loigman v. Kimmelman, 102 N.J. 98 (1986). The foregoing
response to your request for access to government records incorporates the
aforementioned balancing test. Please note that "a party's status as a
litigant does not enlarge its access to government records under OPRA”.
MAG Entm't, LLC v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 375 N.J. Super.
534, 545-46 (App. Div. 2005). The Township reserves its right to deny any
request for records that are the subject of any discovery, subpoena or
court order pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5. Moreover, the Township may
restrict access to records sought for a commercial purpose. Id. The
Township reserves the right to raise any other grounds for denial not
raised in this response. Failure of the Township to assert an exemption or
privilege does not act as a waiver of any grounds for denial. Furthermore,
a reviewing Court or the Government Records Council ("GRC") may deem a
denial of access to be authorized on grounds other that those advanced by
a custodian. See Paff v. Twp. of Plainsboro, A-2122- 05T2, 2007 WL 957289,
at *2 (App. Div., Apr. 2, 2007), affirming, Paff v. Township of
Plainsboro, GRC Complaint No. 2005-29 (March 2006). If your request for
access to a government record has been denied or unfilled, you have a
right to challenge the decision by the Township to deny access. At your
option, you may either initiate a proceeding in the Superior Court of New
Jersey or file a complaint with the GRC by completing the Denial of Access
Complaint Form. You may contact the GRC by toll-free telephone at
866-850-0511, by mail at P.O. Box 819, Trenton, NJ, 08625, by e-mail at
[3][email address], or on its website at [4]//www.state.nj.us/grc. The
GRC can also answer other questions about the law. All questions regarding
complaints filed in Superior Court should be directed to the Court Clerk
in your County.
Sincerely,
The OPRA Team
Municipal Clerk’s Office
Department of Revenue and Finance
Township of Nutley, NJ
Office: 973-284-4955
1 Kennedy Drive
Nutley, New Jersey 07110
[5]www.nutleynj.org
References
Visible links
1. https://nutleynj-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g...
2. https://nutleynj-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g...
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=ht...
5. http://www.nutleynj.org/