Policemen on duty

The request was refused by Alpine Borough.

Dear Alpine Borough,

This is a request for public records made under OPRA and the common law right of access. I am not required to fill out an official form. Please acknowledge receipt of this message.
Records requested:

Please provide me with a list of the number of patrolmen on duty, in patrol cars, during a normal weekday, 10 hour shift.

Yours faithfully,

John W. Milner

Chris Belcolle, Alpine Borough

2 Attachments

Please see attached.

 

[1]chief email

 

References

Visible links

Dear Chris Belcolle,

Of the three boxes checked, please be advised that:
1. The first box pertains to the training of policemen. (#20)
2. The second box pertains to the physical security of buildings. (#21)
3. The document in question is called a "Patrol Shift Roster".

The law is provided for you below, and the paragraphs that apply are identified in parenthesis:
https://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/nj...

In addition, Governor Whitman's Executive Order #69 (below, section 3, paragraph's a thru g), pertains to information that must be released by law enforcement at the time a crime is commenced, reflecting United States Department of Justice guidelines.
https://nj.gov/infobank/circular/eow69.s...

Yours sincerely,

John W. Milner

Chris Belcolle, Alpine Borough

Mr. Milner,

In regard to your response below, the following privileged or protected categories were noted in our initial response:

Box 1. Safety of persons or public/Building security - Emergency or security information or procedures for any buildings or facility which, if disclosed, would jeopardize security of the building or facility or persons therein.

Box 2. Security measures and surveillance techniques - Security measures and surveillance techniques which, if disclosed, would create a risk to the safety of persons, property, electronic data or software.

Item 3. No responsive record exists in reference to your request for a "Patrol Shift Roster". Furthermore, your request sought data or information rather than an identifiable record.

Initially, the following Executive Order was noted regarding data/information sought:

-Executive Order 21 (1a) -
1) Records where inspection, examination or copying would substantially interfere with the State's ability to protect and defend the State and its citizens against acts of sabotage or terrorism, or which, if disclosed, would materially increase the risk or consequences of potential acts of sabotage or terrorism.

In addition, the following Executive Order has been noted regarding the data/information sought:

-Executive Order 69 (4)
4. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Executive Order, where it shall appear that the information requested or to be examined will jeopardize the safety of any person or jeopardize any investigation in progress or may be otherwise inappropriate to release, such information may be withheld. This section is intended to be narrowly construed to prevent disclosure of information which would be truly harmful to a bona fide law enforcement purpose or public safety if released. It is also intended to prevent such release that would violate existing law regarding confidentiality in areas including, but not limited to, domestic violence and juveniles.

Sincerely,

Chief Belcolle

show quoted sections