Police reports and body cam footage.

The request was partially successful.

Dear Evesham Township,

This is a request for public records made under OPRA and the common law right of access. I am not required to fill out an official form. Please acknowledge receipt of this message.
Records requested:

All police reports, complaints, and the CAD for the arrest of Kelli Bowen.

Body cam footage of all officers from the early morning raid on Kelli Bowen’s home.

Yours faithfully,

Patrick Duff

Corbett, Katherine,

2 Attachments

Mr. Duff:

 

Attached please find the partial response to your OPRA request received
10/12/23.

 

Katherine Corbett

Risk Management Coordinator

Evesham Township Police Department

[1]984 Tuckerton Road  

[2]Marlton, NJ 08053

[3](856) 985-6022

[4][email address]

 

[5]cid:image001.png@01D71186.FC982C00

 

 

References

Visible links
1. file:///tmp/x-apple-data-detectors:/1/
2. file:///tmp/x-apple-data-detectors:/2/0
3. file:///tmp/tel:(856)%20985-4348
4. mailto:[email address]

Dear Corbett, Katherine,

What is redacted on the top right hand side of the arrest report? It looks like a time stamp of some sort, which should not be redacted. Please let me know why the need for such a redaction?

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Duff

Corbett, Katherine,

Mr. Duff:

Per the index, the redaction is for a mug shot, which is exempted from release pursuant to Executive Order 69 Whitman 1997 (continued in EO 21 McGreevey 2002.)

Katherine Corbett
Risk Management Coordinator
Evesham Township Police Department
984 Tuckerton Road  
Marlton, NJ 08053
(856) 985-6022
[email address]

show quoted sections

Dear Corbett, Katherine,

Yet you put it out in a press release that wound up posted on your public Facebook page and in several news outlets? You have to admit, something seems a bit off about that. But hey, I’ll read the case law and have some feedback on the denial. Oh, sorry, I’ll just go to your FaceBook page to get the photo.

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Duff

Corbett, Katherine,

2 Attachments

Mr. Duff:

 

Attached please find the response to your OPRA request received 10/12/23.

 

Katherine Corbett

Risk Management Coordinator

Evesham Township Police Department

[1]984 Tuckerton Road  

[2]Marlton, NJ 08053

[3](856) 985-6022

[4][email address]

 

[5]cid:image001.png@01D71186.FC982C00

 

 

References

Visible links
1. file:///tmp/x-apple-data-detectors:/1/
2. file:///tmp/x-apple-data-detectors:/2/0
3. file:///tmp/tel:(856)%20985-4348
4. mailto:[email address]

Dear Corbett, Katherine,

I am just checking to see if I can get the body cam footage of the big raid tomorrow?

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Duff

Dear Corbett, Katherine,

I was really looking forward to watching your cops make the big bust today. When will I get the body cam footage and the rest of the materials?

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Duff

Dear Corbett, Katherine,

I believe you sent the response to this request to the wrong opra. Is this the one where you'd require a fee?

If so, I do not need all of the officers involved, how about just the footage from Detective Mahan for the arrest?

Yours sincerely,

Patrick Duff

Corbett, Katherine,



I will be out of the office until Monday 10/30/23.  I will reply to emails
upon my return.

 

If you would like to file an OPRA request, please submit the request
through the Evesham Police website at [1]www.eveshampd.org/records or by
using the kiosk in the ETPD lobby. 

 

Please note that OPRA time limits do not begin until receipt of the OPRA
by the custodian of records. OPRAs will be answered in the order in which
they are received.

References

Visible links
1. file:///tmp/www.eveshampd.org/records

Dear Evesham Township,

This request is long overdue. Please send me the body cam from the arresting officer, which was Detective Mahan. He was the one who entered her bedroom while she was changing.

Yours faithfully,

Patrick Duff

Dear Evesham Township,

I apologize, I did not see that the body cam from this request was denied. I do not agree that the body cam footage is a part of the investigation, and should not be fully denied. If certain portions need redactions, then so be it, but the investigation is over, it is not?

Yours faithfully,

Patrick Duff