Requests similar to 'OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019' (page 17)

Attached is the most recent SEA contract.  Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Adrian Osofsky Assistant Business Administrator...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Franklin Township (Gloucester) to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Hi, At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, provide t...
OPRA request -- use of force reports 2017-2019
Response by Penns Grove Borough to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Dear Mr. Kim, Please see the attached with regard to your request. Respectfully, BOROUGH OF PENNS GROYE (856) 299-0098 (856) 299-3411 Fax June I S...
Good afternoon,   At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appr...
Good afternoon,   At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appr...
"At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, provide the d...
Taeho Kim: This is in response to your OPRA Request: Please find attached a letter of request for extension of time. Please provide all purchase orde...
Good Morning Mr. Kim, Please see the attached in response to your request. Respectfully, BOROUGH OF PENNS GROYE (856) 299-0098 (856) 299-3411 Fax J...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Delanco Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Please be advised that we have reviewed the above referenced request, and we are in the process of retrieving the documents that are responsive to this...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Delran Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Please see below and please disregard my previous extension request. At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond th...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Egg Harbor Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

At this time, your request requires an additional thirty (30) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, provide the docu...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Galloway Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Township of Galloway Open Public Records Act Request   Reference Number OPRA-2020-00216   Dear Taeho Kim,   Kelli Danieli has commented t...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Greenwich Township (Gloucester) to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Please be advised that we have reviewed the above referenced request, and we are in the process of retrieving the documents that are responsive to this...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Mansfield Township (Burlington) to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good Afternoon, At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropri...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Medford Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Mr. Kim, Please be advised that we have reviewed the above referenced request, and we are in the process of retrieving the documents that are responsi...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Mullica Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, provide the do...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Pemberton Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good Afternoon, At this time, your request requires an additional thirty (30) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, p...
OPRA: police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Woolwich Township to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good Morning Taeho Kim, Please be advised that we have reviewed the above referenced request, and we are in the process of retrieving the documents t...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Avalon Borough to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good afternoon, At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropria...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Bordentown City to Taeho Kim on .

Information not held

Please be advised that we have reviewed the above referenced request, and we are in the process of retrieving the documents that are responsive to this...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Buena Borough to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good afternoon, At this time, your request requires an additional thirty (30) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, p...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Longport Borough to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Dear US Research: Thank you for your OPRA Request 2020-31. Please note that these records are maintained by a third party and they have indicated t...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Margate City to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

The City of Margate City, NJ received your Open Public Records Act request on May 28, 2020.   At this time, your request requires an additional th...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Millville City to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

Good morning, At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate,...
OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019
Response by Newfield Borough to Taeho Kim on .

Awaiting classification

"At this time, your request requires an additional forty-five (45) days beyond the seven (7) business days to review, and if appropriate, provide the d...