Open Public Records Act and Common Law Request Regarding Implementation of the New Jersey Attorney General Immigrant Trust Directive 2018-6
S.I. Newhouse Center for Law and Justice
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
123 Washington Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102-3094
p. 973-353-3159
October 13, 2020
Municipal Clerk for Municipal Police
RE: Open Public Records Act and Common Law Request Regarding Implementation of the New Jersey Attorney General Immigrant Trust Directive 2018-6
Dear Records Custodian,
Pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (OPRA – N.J.S.A.47:1A-1, et seq.) and common law right of access, we write seeking to obtain records related to how your department (herein referred to as “the Department”) has implemented the New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal’s Immigrant Trust Directive 2018-6 and how this agency works with federal immigration enforcement officials. We ask that you please direct this request to all appropriate offices, departments, and records custodians within the Department that may supply any of the records sought through this request.
A. Our Common Law Interest
The Immigrant Trust Directive intends to curtail state and local participation in federal immigration enforcement, ensure effective policing, and foster relationships between law enforcement agencies and immigrant communities. As part of a scholarly research project, we, the requestors, seek these documents in order to assess the degree to which the Department is committed to implementing the directive and is in compliance with public records request laws.
We the requesters are Dean Rose Cuison-Villazor and Dr. Peter Mancina. Dean Cuison-Villazor is Vice Dean, Professor of Law, and Chancellor’s Social Justice Scholar of the Rutgers Law School and Director of the Center for Immigration Law, Policy, and Justice. She has written and published extensively about non-cooperation policies or “sanctuary” policies, which have been published in the Columbia Law Review, Minnesota Law Review, Washington University Law Review, and UC Davis Law Review. Dean Cuison-Villazor is also Director of the Center for Immigration Law, Policy and Justice (CILPJ), which engages in interdisciplinary scholarship, research, and advocacy focused on exploring more inclusive immigration and citizenship laws.
Dr. Peter Mancina is Visiting Scholar in the Center for Immigration Law, Policy, and Justice at
Rutgers Law School, Researcher in the Department of Social Anthropology at Stockholm
University, and Research Associate in the University of Oxford Centre for Criminology and Border Criminologies Program. Dr. Mancina has examined the historical development of sanctuary policy in the United States and police compliance with “sanctuary” laws at the local, county, and state levels. He is author of the 2019 policy implementation report Turning the Golden State into a Sanctuary State: A Report on the Impact and Implementation of the California Values Act (SB54).
We greatly appreciate your assistance in providing us the following documents.
B. Requested Records
I. Policies, Regulations, Memorandum, Guidance, and Forms
1. All records of policies, regulations, memorandum, guidance, or forms that the Department has adopted related to the implementation of the New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal’s Immigrant Trust Directive 2018-6 version 1 (issued on November 29, 2018) and version 2 (issued on March 15, 2019) , herein both versions referred to collectively as the “Directive.” Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present.
2. All records of policies, procedures, protocols, directives, general orders that the Department has adopted regarding providing any form of assistance to, undertaking joint operations with, or forming joint task forces with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE” (including ICE Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”)).
Examples of such policies may pertain to how the Department
a. books or releases federal criminal or immigration detainees; transfers individuals into federal custody;
b. provides DHS, CBP, ICE, and HSI access to department facilities, Department computers, information technology networks, department databases;
c. provides immigration agencies use of Department offices, desk space, or space where they can carry out their federal work;
d. responds to federal requests for a notification of an inmate’s release date, time, and place, as well as any personally identifying information for the individual;
e. detains individuals for the purpose of enforcing immigration law;
f. acts upon DHS, CBP, ICE, and HSI administrative warrants;
g. responds to federal immigration agency requests to interview people in Department custody and provides access to these individuals to carry out an interview;
h. provides backup assistance including but not limited to traffic control and perimeter security in the event of an immigration enforcement action or emergency situation;
i. provides booking rosters, intake rosters, or lists of detainees in Department detention facilities;
j. asks members of the public, witnesses, suspects, or those who have been arrested about immigration status information;
k. patrols U.S. national borders;
l. processes requests for T- and U-visa certifications; or
m. submits Immigrant Alien Queries (IAQs) to the ICE Law Enforcement Support Center (“ICE-LESC”) and acts upon Immigrant Alien Responses (IARs) from the ICE-LESC as part of the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present.
II. Agreements, Contracts, or Memorandum of Understanding
3. All agreements, contracts, or Memorandum of Understanding, including any addendum or renewal document between DHS, ICE, ICE-HSI, or CBP and the Department. Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present
III. Training Records
4. All records that the Department has used to train its members about the Directive, including training materials, manuals, memorandums, and power point presentations. Date range: November 29, 2018 to the present
5. Any training logs records that the Department has created to track the completion of training of its employees in the Directive or Directive-related Department policies. Date range: November 29, 2018 to the present
IV. Incident Reports
6. All incident reports related to the Department providing any form of assistance to CBP or ICE, (including HSI) as described in request number 2, participation in joint task forces, a 287g program, or any other form of joint operation with CBP, or ICE (including HSI).
Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present
7. All incident reports related to incidents when CBP or ICE, (including HSI) arrested an individual on Department property immediately after they were released from Department custody to the public. Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present
V. Quantitative Data Reports Regarding Department Assistance to ICE and CBP
8. All records (including electronically stored information in a database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data) that provide the number of instances when the Department accommodated an ICE or CBP request for the Department to
a. detain an individual
b. transfer an individual to ICE or CBP custody
c. notify ICE or CBP of the person’s release from Department custody
d. provide backup assistance for an immigration enforcement action
e. provide backup assistance for an emergency situation
f. allow ICE or CBP to interview an individual in Department custody
g. participate in a joint operation with ICE or CBP; or
h. any other form of assistance to ICE or CBP Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
9. All reports, emails, and memorandum that explain the reason, purpose, policy basis, or goal for which the Department accommodated ICE or CBP requests for assistance outlined in request number 8. Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
10. All records (including electronically stored information in a database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data), arrest reports, CAD reports or similar records) that list
a. the number of individuals arrested during joint operations with DHS, ICE, or
CBP;
b. the criminal charges brought against each individual that was arrested during joint operations with DHS, ICE, or CBP; or
c. the number of individuals charged with civil immigration violations during joint operations with DHS, ICE, or CBP.
Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
11. All records (including electronically stored information in a database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data), that list the number of people that the Department released to the public and who were immediately arrested by ICE or CBP on Department property. Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
VI. Detainee Movement Logs
12. All records that include the “movement history” logs of individuals in Department custody for whom an I-247 detainer, notification request, or transfer request was lodged. This may include records logging how individuals are moved through different Department divisions, wings, areas, programs, or Department facilities (ie. Booking, housing). Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
VII. Communications Records
13. All communications (herein, “communications” refers to emails, texts, faxes, letters, social media posts) about implementing the Directive in the Department, how the Department interacts with or assists ICE and CBP, or making inmate release information available to the public between Department Command Staff or Supervising Staff and the following types of Department employees:
a. Those who contribute to the development of department policy;
b. Those who directly interact with the public;
c. Those who directly interact with people in Department custody; and
d. Those who directly interact with federal immigration agencies Date Range: November, 29, 2018 to the present
14. All communications about implementing the Directive in the Department, how the Department interacts with ICE and CBP, or making inmate release information available to the public between Department Personnel and individuals in the following external agencies:
a. ICE;
b. CBP;
c. The U.S. Department of Justice;
d. The White House;
e. The New Jersey Department of Justice;
f. The Sheriffs Association of New Jersey; or
g. The New Jersey State Association of Chiefs of Police Date Range: November, 29, 2018 to the present
We request that all responsive records be sent as electronic files via email to [email address]. If the Department cannot provide responsive documents to certain requests above, please indicate the number of the request and the reason for the denial.
As N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(i) provides that public agencies respond to OPRA records requests within 7 days, I look forward to hearing from you within this time.
Thank you in advance and we look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Dean Rose Cuison-Villazor
Vice Dean, Professor of Law and Chancellor’s Social Justice Scholar
Director, Center for Immigration Law, Policy and Justice
Rutgers Law School
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
Phone number: (973) 353-3159
Email: [email address]
Dr. Peter Mancina
Visiting Scholar, Center for Immigration Law, Policy and Justice
Rutgers Law School
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
Phone number: (415)-226-8714
Email: [email address]
FN 1 . The term “records” as used herein means records as broadly defined by N.J.S.A.47:1A-1.1 and includes, “any paper, written or printed book, document, drawing, map, plan, photograph, microfilm, data processed or image processed document, information stored or maintained electronically or by sound-recording or in a similar device, or any copy thereof, that has been made, maintained or kept on file in the course of his or its official business by any officer, commission, agency or authority of the State or of any political subdivision thereof, including subordinate boards thereof, or that has been received in the course of his or its official business by any such officer, commission, agency, or authority of the State or of any political subdivision thereof, including subordinate boards thereof. The terms shall not include inter-agency or intra-agency advisory, consultative, or deliberative material.” “Records” that we are interested in obtaining are those that not only are stored in government office locations, on government servers, or on government computers and devices but also in private locations and storage facilities, on private servers, on private computers and devices, in private email accounts, and in public and private social media accounts.
FN 2. Version 1: https://web.archive.org/web/201905020003...
FN 3. Version 2: https://www.nj.gov/oag/dcj/agguide/direc...
Yours faithfully,
Rose Cuison-Villazor
Dear Ms. Cuison-Villazor:
The Township is in receipt of your OPRA requested dated and received on
October 13, 2020. Please note that we will require a three-day extension
of time, until October 27, 2020 to review and respond to this request in
light of its voluminous nature.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Lt. Jeffrey Gomez
Randolph Twp Police Department
502 Millbrook Avenue
Randolph NJ 07869
973-989-7013
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
reply to the sender, so that we can arrange for proper delivery, and then
please delete the message from your Inbox. Thank you.
Request 1. All records of policies, regulations, memorandum, guidance, or
forms that the Department has adopted related to the implementation of the
New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal’s Immigrant Trust Directive
2018-6 version 1 (issued on November 29, 2018) and version 2 (issued on
March 15, 2019) , herein both versions referred to collectively as the
“Directive.” Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present.
Response: To the extent this request seeks policies, regulations,
memorandums, guidance or forms implementing the AG Directive 2018-6
versions 1 and 2, all responsive directives and general orders are
attached. As for the portion of the request seeking records “related to”
the implementation of same, this is vague and requires the Custodian to
perform research in order to search for and identify any responsive
records, particularly in the absence of identifiable records being sought
from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381 N.J.
Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must identify
with reasonable clarity those documents that are desired"); Lagerkvist v.
Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230, 237 (App. Div. 2015)
(OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct research among its
records ... and correlate data from various government records in the
custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey
Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App. Div.
2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered, reviewed,
or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents sought as required
under OPRA).
Request 2. All records of policies, procedures, protocols, directives,
general orders that the Department has adopted regarding providing any
form of assistance to, undertaking joint operations with, or forming joint
task forces with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (“CBP”), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(“ICE” (including ICE Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”)).
Examples of such policies may pertain to how the Department a. books or
releases federal criminal or immigration detainees; transfers individuals
into federal custody; b. provides DHS, CBP, ICE, and HSI access to
department facilities, Department computers, information technology
networks, department databases; c. provides immigration agencies use of
Department offices, desk space, or space where they can carry out their
federal work; d. responds to federal requests for a notification of an
inmate’s release date, time, and place, as well as any personally
identifying information for the individual; e. detains individuals for the
purpose of enforcing immigration law; f. acts upon DHS, CBP, ICE, and HSI
administrative warrants; g. responds to federal immigration agency
requests to interview people in Department custody and provides access to
these individuals to carry out an interview; h. provides backup assistance
including but not limited to traffic control and perimeter security in the
event of an immigration enforcement action or emergency situation; i.
provides booking rosters, intake rosters, or lists of detainees in
Department detention facilities; j. asks members of the public, witnesses,
suspects, or those who have been arrested about immigration status
information; k. patrols U.S. national borders; l. processes requests for
T- and U-visa certifications; or m. submits Immigrant Alien Queries (IAQs)
to the ICE Law Enforcement Support Center (“ICE-LESC”) and acts upon
Immigrant Alien Responses (IARs) from the ICE-LESC as part of the State
Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) Date Range: November 29, 2018 to
the present.
Response: No responsive records.
Request 3. All agreements, contracts, or Memorandum of Understanding,
including any addendum or renewal document between DHS, ICE, ICE-HSI, or
CBP and the Department. Date Range: November 29, 2018 to the present
Response: See the directives and general orders attached.
Request 4. All records that the Department has used to train its members
about the Directive, including training materials, manuals, memorandums,
and power point presentations. Date range: November 29, 2018 to the
present
Response: See the directives and general orders attached.
Request 5. Any training logs records that the Department has created to
track the completion of training of its employees in the Directive or
Directive-related Department policies. Date range: November 29, 2018 to
the present
Response: See training certificates and training logs attached.
Request 6. All incident reports related to the Department providing any
form of assistance to CBP or ICE, (including HSI) as described in request
number 2, participation in joint task forces, a 287g program, or any other
form of joint operation with CBP, or ICE (including HSI). Date Range:
November 29, 2018 to the present
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive incident reports, particularly in the absence of precise search
terms from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381
N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must
identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are
desired"); Lagerkvist v. Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230,
237 (App. Div. 2015) (OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct
research among its records ... and correlate data from various government
records in the custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v.
New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App.
Div. 2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered,
reviewed, or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents sought as
required under OPRA).
Nevertheless, as noted in response to Request 2, the Township does not
provide any assistance and does not participate in any such joint task
forces, programs, or joint operations as described in this request.
Request 7. All incident reports related to incidents when CBP or ICE,
(including HSI) arrested an individual on Department property immediately
after they were released from Department custody to the public. Date
Range: November 29, 2018 to the present.
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive incident reports, particularly in the absence of precise search
terms from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381
N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must
identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are
desired"); Lagerkvist v. Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230,
237 (App. Div. 2015) (OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct
research among its records ... and correlate data from various government
records in the custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v.
New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App.
Div. 2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered,
reviewed, or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents sought as
required under OPRA). As such, this request is invalid as drafted.
Nevertheless, the Township has not had any such incidents during the time
period requested.
Request 8. All records (including electronically stored information in a
database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data) that
provide the number of instances when the Department accommodated an ICE or
CBP request for the Department to a. detain an individual b. transfer an
individual to ICE or CBP custody c. notify ICE or CBP of the person’s
release from Department custody d. provide backup assistance for an
immigration enforcement action e. provide backup assistance for an
emergency situation f. allow ICE or CBP to interview an individual in
Department custody g. participate in a joint operation with ICE or CBP; or
h. any other form of assistance to ICE or CBP Date Range: November 29,
2017 to the present
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive records, particularly in the absence of precise search terms
from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381 N.J.
Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must identify
with reasonable clarity those documents that are desired"); Lagerkvist v.
Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230, 237 (App. Div. 2015)
(OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct research among its
records ... and correlate data from various government records in the
custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey
Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App. Div.
2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered, reviewed,
or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents
sought as required under OPRA). As such, this request is invalid as
drafted.
Nevertheless, the Township has not had any such instances during the time
period requested.
Request 9. All reports, emails, and memorandum that explain the reason,
purpose, policy basis, or goal for which the Department accommodated ICE
or CBP requests for assistance outlined in request number 8. Date Range:
November 29, 2017 to the present
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive records, particularly in the absence of precise search terms
from the requestor. As such, this request is invalid as drafted. See Bent
v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381 N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005)
(“a proper request under OPRA must identify with reasonable clarity those
documents that are desired"); Lagerkvist v. Office of Governor of State,
443 N.J. Super. 230, 237 (App. Div. 2015) (OPRA does not require that “the
custodian ‘conduct research among its records ... and correlate data from
various government records in the custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey
Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J.
Super. 166, 178 (App. Div. 2007)(request for documents and data “relied
upon, considered, reviewed, or otherwise utilized” failed to identify
documents sought as required under OPRA).
Nevertheless, as noted in response to Request 8, the Township has not had
any such instances during the time period requested.
Request 10. All records (including electronically stored information in a
database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data), arrest
reports, CAD reports or similar records) that list a. the number of
individuals arrested during joint operations with DHS, ICE, or CBP; b. the
criminal charges brought against each individual that was arrested during
joint operations with DHS, ICE, or CBP; or c. the number of individuals
charged with civil immigration violations during joint operations with
DHS, ICE, or CBP. Date Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive incident reports, particularly in the absence of precise search
terms from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381
N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must
identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are
desired"); Lagerkvist v. Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230,
237 (App. Div. 2015) (OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct
research among its records ... and correlate data from various government
records in the custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v.
New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App.
Div. 2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered,
reviewed, or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents sought as
required under OPRA).
Nevertheless, as noted in response to Request 2, the Township does not
provide any assistance and does not participate in any such joint task
forces, programs, or joint operations as described in this request.
Request 11. All records (including electronically stored information in a
database, written reports, statistics, memoranda or other data), that list
the number of people that the Department released to the public and who
were immediately arrested by ICE or CBP on Department property. Date
Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
Response: This request is vague and broad as drafted and requires the
Custodian to perform research in order to search for and identify any
responsive incident reports, particularly in the absence of precise search
terms from the requestor. See Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't., 381
N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (“a proper request under OPRA must
identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are
desired"); Lagerkvist v. Office of Governor of State, 443 N.J. Super. 230,
237 (App. Div. 2015) (OPRA does not require that “the custodian ‘conduct
research among its records ... and correlate data from various government
records in the custodian's possession.’”); New Jersey Builders Ass'n v.
New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 390 N.J. Super. 166, 178 (App.
Div. 2007)(request for documents and data “relied upon, considered,
reviewed, or otherwise utilized” failed to identify documents sought as
required under OPRA).
Nevertheless, the Township has not had any such instances of arrest during
the time period requested.
Request 12. All records that include the “movement history” logs of
individuals in Department custody for whom an I-247 detainer, notification
request, or transfer request was lodged. This may include records logging
how individuals are moved through different Department divisions, wings,
areas, programs, or Department facilities (ie. Booking, housing). Date
Range: November 29, 2017 to the present
Response: The Township does not have any responsive movement history logs.
Request 13. All communications (herein, “communications” refers to emails,
texts, faxes, letters, social media posts) about implementing the
Directive in the Department, how the Department interacts with or assists
ICE and CBP, or making inmate release information available to the public
between Department Command Staff or Supervising Staff and the following
types of Department employees:
a. Those who contribute to the development of department policy; b. Those
who directly interact with the public; c. Those who directly interact with
people in Department custody; and d. Those who directly interact with
federal immigration agencies Date Range: November, 29, 2018 to the present
Response: This request for communications is invalid as it fails to
identify a precise subject matter and search terms such to allow for a
search of responsive records. To the extent you would like the Township
to conduct a search for communications, please provide precise search
terms to be utilized. Additionally, the categories of potential
custodians listed in subsections (b) and (c) are too vague for the
Township to identify particular custodians for a search of responsive
records. To the extent you would like the Township to conduct a search for
communications, please provide precise search terms to be utilized and
identify with specificity the custodians or categories of employees whose
accounts are to be searched.
Request 14. All communications about implementing the Directive in the
Department, how the Department interacts with ICE and CBP, or making
inmate release information available to the public between Department
Personnel and individuals in the following external agencies:
a. ICE;
b. CBP;
c. The U.S. Department of Justice;
d. The White House;
e. The New Jersey Department of Justice; f. The Sheriffs Association of
New Jersey; or g. The New Jersey State Association of Chiefs of Police
Date Range: November, 29, 2018 to the present We request that all
responsive records be sent as electronic files via email to [email
address]. If the Department cannot provide responsive documents to certain
requests above, please indicate the number of the request and the reason
for the denial.
Response: This request for communications is invalid as it fails to
identify a precise subject matter and search terms such to allow for a
search of responsive records. To the extent you would like the Township
to conduct a search for communications, please provide precise search
terms to be utilized.
Respectfully submitted,
Lt. Jeffrey Gomez
Randolph Twp Police Department
502 Millbrook Avenue
Randolph NJ 07869
973-989-7013
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
reply to the sender, so that we can arrange for proper delivery, and then
please delete the message from your Inbox. Thank you.