CAD Report

Thomas made this OPRA request to Cherry Hill Township Automatic anti-spam measures are in place for this older request. Please let us know if a further response is expected or if you are having trouble responding.

The request was refused by Cherry Hill Township.

Dear Cherry Hill Township,

Please accept this electronic request for public records made under OPRA and the common law right of access. I am not required to fill out an official form or use a particular software platform to submit my request per NJSA 47:1A-6(f), which states that an email from a requestor including all of the information required on the adopted form shall suffice in place of a completed form as a valid government record request.

Records requested:

Police CAD report, along with officer narrative, for the police response(s) to the 100 Block of Sharrowvale Road on 12/10/2024 from 0100hrs to 1300hrs of the same day.

My preferred delivery method for response(s) to this request is by E-mail as attachments. Please confirm you have received this request. If you are not the custodian of records, please forward my request to that person and provide their email address to me for future reference.

Yours faithfully,

Thomas

Cherry Hill Township

2 Attachments

OPRA-Req-24-2126
Date Received: 12/12/2024
Status: Completed
Date Completed: 12/12/2024
Applicant: Thomas
Information Requested: Records requested:

Police CAD report, along with officer narrative, for the police
response(s) to the 100 Block of Sharrowvale Road on 12/10/2024
from 0100hrs to 1300hrs of the same day.

My preferred delivery method for response(s) to this request is by
E-mail as attachments. Please confirm you have received this
request. If you are not the custodian of records, please forward
my request to that person and provide their email address to me
for future reference.

Thomas,

After careful review of your OPRA request received December 12,
2024, we have determined that your request is for documents that
are considered exempt as noted below:

N.J.S.A. 47:1A-3(a) Specifically No. 24) Ongoing investigations -
any records pertaining to an investigation in progress by any
public agency if disclosure of such record or records shall be
detrimental to the public interest. This provision shall not be
construed to allow any public agency to prohibit access to a
record of that agency that was open for public inspection,
examination, or copying before the investigation commenced.

As a result of our search, subsequent findings and this response
to your request, we have marked your OPRA request received
December 12, 2024 as satisfied and closed.

A copy of the Denial Poster with instructions to applicants who
wish to appeal any denial or part thereof is attached hereto. You
have the right to appeal the decision that the document or
documents are not public records. You may take your appeal to the
Government Records Council or the New Jersey Superior Court, as
provided by N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq.

If you have any additional questions and/or concerns, or if we can
be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our
office at (856) 488-7892.

Thank you for your time.

Patti Chacker, RMC
Township Clerk
By: Danielle Gyenge

[1]Update Notification Preferences

Please do not respond to this email. For assistance, contact the
municipality directly.
SDL Portal - Spatial Data Logic 2023

References

Visible links
1. https://u131632.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click...

Dear Cherry Hill Township,

For clarification, is it the Township's position that there is no method of redaction of the CAD report regarding the call for service that can result in the document being produced? My understanding is this document would simply contain addresses, officers involved with their arrival and departure times, and other binary information and is not an investigative record.

Additionally, it appears that it is the Township's position that the release of such a record is detrimental to the public interest as stated in the denial letter. It is my position that a simple CAD dispatch report regarding a homicide in a residential neighborhood is very much in the interest of the public at large and cannot fathom how one could deem it detrimental.

Please confirm that the Township will not produce the record requested or reply with the responsive records.

In the event of a confirmation of denial, please clearly state who specifically is denying the request (the e-mail indicates both Danielle Gyenge and Patti Chacker) so that I have the correct information for the GRC appeal.

Yours faithfully,

Thomas

Patti Chacker, Cherry Hill Township

Thomas,

Yes, it is the position of the Township that the entire record pertains to an investigation in progress and the release of such a record is inimical to the public interest. I am confirming that the Township of Cherry Hill is denying that portion of your request on those grounds.

Additionally, the person denying the request is myself, Patti Chacker, in my capacity as Records Custodian for the Township of Cherry Hill.

Best Regards,
Patti Chacker
 

show quoted sections