We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are SneakyPete please sign in and let everyone know.

2023 Overtime Records for Lt. Nickolas Szymanski #86

SneakyPete made this OPRA request to Marlboro Township Police Department Automatic anti-spam measures are in place for this older request. Please let us know if a further response is expected or if you are having trouble responding.

We're waiting for SneakyPete to read a recent response and update the status.

Dear Records Custodian,

Pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq., I am requesting access to the following public records:
1. A detailed report of all overtime earnings for Lieutenant Nickolas Szymanski #86 for the calendar year 2023.
2. Please separate the total earnings into:
• Patrol Overtime (Regular Overtime)
• Extra Duty Details (also known as private or special details, road jobs)
3. For each category, please provide the total amount in U.S. dollars earned during 2023.
4. For patrol overtime, please also include any associated codes, reasons, or justifications listed for each overtime entry (e.g., “court appearance,” “shift extension,” “staff shortage,” etc.).

Please provide the records in electronic format (PDF or Excel preferred). If there are any fees for searching or copying these records, please inform me before fulfilling the request. However, I request a waiver of all fees as this information is being sought in the public interest.

If any portion of the requested records is exempt from disclosure, please provide the non-exempt portions and cite the specific exemption(s) for any withheld materials.

I look forward to your response within the statutory time frame. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if clarification is needed.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

With curiosity and a commitment to responsible use of taxpayer dollars,

SneakyPete

Dear Marlboro Township Police Department,

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to follow up on an Open Public Records Act (OPRA) request I submitted on May 14, 2025. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq., a response was due within seven (7) business days, which would have been no later than May 23, 2025.

As of today’s date, I have not received an acknowledgment of the request, nor have I received a request for an extension, as is required under the statute if additional time is needed to fulfill the request.

Please confirm receipt of my original request and provide an update on its current status. I respectfully request that the appropriate steps be taken to bring this request into compliance with OPRA.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Yours faithfully,
SneakyPete

Allan Bilinski, Marlboro Township Police Department

Dear SneakyPete:

The Township of Marlboro ("Township") is in receipt of your Open Public Records Act ("OPRA") request seeking records related to Lt. Nickolas Szymanski. Please be advised your request seeks personnel records exempt from disclosure in accordance with OPRA, specifically N.J.S.A. 47:1A-10. As such, the Township must deny your request.

Lt. Allan Bilinski
Administrative Lieutenant
Accreditation Manager
 
Marlboro Township Police Department
1979 Township Drive
Marlboro, NJ 07746
 
Phone: 732-536-5432
Fax:  732-972-7522
[email address]
 
          

show quoted sections

Dear Allen Bilinski,

Thank you for your response to my recent Open Public Records Act (OPRA) request.

I respectfully disagree with the denial of access to the overtime compensation records for the officer in question. As you may be aware, New Jersey courts have consistently held that public employee salary and compensation information, including overtime pay, is subject to disclosure under OPRA.

In particular, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Asbury Park Press v. County of Monmouth, 2017 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2063 (App. Div. Aug. 21, 2017), reaffirmed that payroll records, including the amount of overtime paid to government employees, are public records. The court found that such information is not protected by any OPRA exemption and is essential for transparency and public oversight of government spending.

Furthermore, the Government Records Council (GRC) has repeatedly ruled that requests for overtime and compensation data do not violate privacy rights when they relate to public employees acting in their official capacity.

Unless the denial is based on a specific statutory exemption, I respectfully request that you reconsider and fulfill the request in accordance with OPRA. If there is a legal basis for the denial, please provide the precise statutory citation and a detailed explanation as required under N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(g).

Yours sincerely,

SneakyPete

Dear Marlboro Township Police Department,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Open Public Records Act reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Marlboro Township Police Department's handling of my OPRA request '2023 Overtime Records for Lt. Nickolas Szymanski

New Jersey courts have consistently held that public employee salary and compensation information, including overtime pay, is subject to disclosure under OPRA.

In particular, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Asbury Park Press v. County of Monmouth, 2017 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2063 (App. Div. Aug. 21, 2017), reaffirmed that payroll records, including the amount of overtime paid to government employees, are public records. The court found that such information is not protected by any OPRA exemption and is essential for transparency and public oversight of government spending.

Furthermore, the Government Records Council (GRC) has repeatedly ruled that requests for overtime and compensation data do not violate privacy rights when they relate to public employees acting in their official capacity.

Unless the denial is based on a specific statutory exemption, I respectfully request that you reconsider and fulfill the request in accordance with OPRA. If there is a legal basis for the denial, please provide the precise statutory citation and a detailed explanation as required under N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(g).

A full history of my OPRA request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://opramachine.com/request/2023_ove...

Yours faithfully,

SneakyPete

Judith Sham, Marlboro Township Police Department

OPRA request received. I will forward the request.

Judith Sham
Records Supervisor
Marlboro Township Police
1979 Township drive
Marlboro, NJ 07746
732-536-0100 ext. 1423
[email address]

show quoted sections

Allan Bilinski, Marlboro Township Police Department

The Township of Marlboro is in receipt of your OPRA request dated June 19, 2025, specifically requesting “an internal review of Marlboro Township Police Department's handling of my OPRA request '2023 Overtime Records for Lt. Nickolas Szymanski.” . Please be advised that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq., your request does not constitute a valid OPRA request. OPRA operates to make identifiable government records "readily accessible for inspection, copying, or examination." Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't, Custodian of Records, 381 N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005). As such, a proper request under OPRA must identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are desired. Id. A records request must be well defined so that the custodian knows precisely what records are sought. The request should not require the records custodian to undertake a subjective analysis to understand the nature of the request. Seeking particular information from the custodian is permissible; expecting the custodian to do research is not. Paff v. Galloway Tp., 229 N.J. 340, 355 (2017).

Asking for “an internal review” is not a request for responsive records. Accordingly, an OPRA request that does not define what responsive documents/records are being sought is invalid under the statute, and longstanding case law.

Lt. Allan Bilinski
Administrative Lieutenant
Accreditation Manager
 
Marlboro Township Police Department
1979 Township Drive
Marlboro, NJ 07746
 
Phone: 732-536-5432
Fax:  732-972-7522
[email address]
 
          

show quoted sections

Dear Allan Bilinski,

First, I must note that your initial failure to respond within the statutory timeframe under N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(i) constitutes a procedural violation of OPRA. Subsequently, the denial you issued cited N.J.S.A. 47:1A-10, asserting that the records were exempt as personnel records. Respectfully, this position reflects a misunderstanding of the statute and its clearly defined exceptions.

While N.J.S.A. 47:1A-10 does exempt most personnel and pension records from disclosure, it explicitly states that the following categories must be disclosed:
• Individual’s name
• Title and position
• Salary and payroll records
• Length of service
• Date and reason of separation (if applicable)
• Amount and type of pension received

The request I submitted falls squarely under these exceptions—specifically under “salary and payroll records.” Overtime compensation, both for municipal patrol work and for extra-duty details, is a payroll record, and therefore subject to disclosure under OPRA. This is supported by the Government Records Council in Simmons v. Ridgefield Borough Police Department, GRC Complaint No. 2004-22, where it was determined that payroll records, including overtime, are disclosable under OPRA when redactions are applied as necessary.

Additionally, the Appellate Division in Asbury Park Press v. County of Monmouth, 406 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 2009), reaffirmed that details of public employee compensation—including overtime—are government records subject to disclosure, as long as they do not include exempt personal information.

Your subsequent claim that the request was “unclear” or “required research” is equally unfounded. My request was specific, targeted, and did not require the creation of new records—merely the production of existing payroll data and overtime justifications already submitted and approved through departmental channels.

To clarify, I am requesting the following public records:
1. A detailed report of all overtime earnings for Lieutenant Nickolas Szymanski (#86) for the calendar year 2023.
2. Separation of total overtime earnings into:
• Patrol Overtime (Regular Overtime)
• Extra Duty Details (also known as special details or road jobs)
3. The total amount in U.S. dollars earned in each category.
4. For patrol overtime only, the associated codes, descriptions, or justifications listed for each entry (e.g., “court appearance,” “shift extension,” “staff shortage”).

This request aligns with OPRA’s transparency objectives and with prior case law interpreting salary and payroll data as publicly accessible. Should any specific entry contain legitimately exempt material (e.g., HIPAA-protected data), I welcome a redacted version in compliance with N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(g).

If this request continues to be denied without appropriate justification, I will have no choice but to seek relief through the Government Records Council, initiate proceedings in Superior Court or an internal affairs complaint into your conduct.

I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to your compliance in accordance with New Jersey law.

Yours sincerely,

SneakyPete

Allan Bilinski, Marlboro Township Police Department

Dear SneakyPete:

The Township of Marlboro is in receipt of your Open Public Records Act (“OPRA”) request seeking the following records:

1. A detailed report of all overtime earnings for Lieutenant Nickolas Szymanski (#86) for the calendar year 2023.
2. Separation of total overtime earnings into:
i. Patrol Overtime (Regular Overtime)
ii. Extra Duty Details (also known as special details or road jobs)
3. The total amount in U.S. dollars earned in each category.
4. For patrol overtime only, the associated codes, descriptions, or justifications listed for each entry (e.g., “court appearance,” “shift extension,” “staff shortage”).

Please be advised that a request for “any and all” documents or open-ended demands “for every document a public agency has on file” has been held to be an improper OPRA request. Gannett N.J. Partners L.P. v. County of Middlesex, 379 N.J. Super. 205 (App. Div. 2005). OPRA does not "'authorize a party to make a blanket request for every document' a public agency has on file. . . . Rather, a party requesting access to a public record under OPRA must specifically describe the document sought." Bent v. Twp. of Stafford Police Dep't, 381 N.J. Super. 30, 37 (App. Div. 2005) (quoting Gannett N.J. Partners, LP v. Cnty. of Middlesex, 379 N.J. Super. 205, 213, (App. Div. 2005)). A valid OPRA request requires "a search, not research." Id. As such, a proper request under OPRA must identify with reasonable clarity those documents that are desired, and a party cannot satisfy this requirement by simply requesting all an agency's documents. Your OPRA request is invalid, as it is overbroad and encompasses research. Your request would require the custodian to research files to obtain responsive information and then create a new record, all of which is not required under OPRA. As such, the Township must deny your request.

Respectfully,

Lt. Allan Bilinski
Administrative Lieutenant
Accreditation Manager
 
Marlboro Township Police Department
1979 Township Drive
Marlboro, NJ 07746
 
Phone: 732-536-5432
Fax:  732-972-7522
[email address]
 
          

show quoted sections

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are SneakyPete please sign in and let everyone know.